Links to Useful documents for the petition drive to have the U.S.
adopt the Canadian Consensus Document for ME/CFS

A team of researchers at DePaul University found the Canadian Consensus Document to be superior to the CDC’s research criteria in identifying patients with serious physical symptoms and functional impairments. [Jason et al, Journal of CFS 2004]. A committee of the IACFS/ME (dedicated to research into CFS and M.E.) has already adopted a version of the Consensus Document for pediatric diagnosis and care [Journal of CFS, 2006].

You can compare them for yourself using the links on this website. We've also included a link to the formal definition of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (M.E.) from 1986.

Links to the disease definitions:


Overview of the Canadian Consensus Document for diagnosing M.E./CFS


Information for clinicians from the CDC's CFS "Toolkit for Professionals"

There is no bibliography in the "Toolkit for Professionals."


Print them out and compare them. Use them to show the difference in the way the disease and patients are perceived when the Canadian Consensus Document is used by clinicians, as opposed to the CDC's "Toolkit."

Return to the websites for the campaign for the U.S. to adopt the Canadian Consensus Document for M.E./CFS:
http://www.cfids-me.org/index.html#consensus.